Jay Collier at Bates ponders the strengths of Drupal and WordPress MU. In my experience WordPress is quicker to get going with, and for most web sites it can rise to most any challenge. And it is the king of multi-site installations. Drupal has a steeper learning curve, but can better support needs such as a work flow-content approval path, or something less traditional, like a content repository system. In meeting a business need the technology is normally the least important element — what are your goals, who is the audience, what do they need, etc. — those are the important questions. Once you have those answers you go looking for a technology. My advice? Look at WordPress first — if it doesn’t do what you want, in a quick straightforward way, keep looking. But in my experience that won’t happen very often.
Evaluating Drupal and WordPress MU | Bates Web Communications
As part of our new Web Hub program — and in previous discovery projects (2008 | 2007) — I’ve been evaluating open-source content management software. Our two finalists are Drupal and WordPress MU.
Displaying enterprise data — such as course listings and directory information — has been the greatest challenge in site architecture prototyping. Both software packages provide support for collections of
custom fields, but what’s important is determining the best repository for each type of data and how to present it on public-facing Web sites.
ADD YOUR COMMENT
Comments are moderated.
Randall Rode's online home for thoughts, notes, and experiments with a wide range of technology topics. Visit the about page for info on my recent projects and professional background. I welcome your comments!
New articles are normally posted on Mondays and Wednesdays. Subscribe to the RSS feed or the email update to keep current on the latest posts.
Past listings from 2004 to the present
Need a home (or better home) for your website? I highly recommend HostRocket -- they are the best!
